Skip to content
Free tool

Find guest post sites, then find out which ones are worth it

Ten search operators built for your topic, ordered so the least-contested ones come first. Then paste your results back and we will tell you which of those sites are already on our vetted marketplace with a published price — and which we have audited before.

Search operators
10
Sites cross-referenced
410
Searches
Unlimited, free
Signup for step 1
None

1. Build the searches

Ten operator patterns, ordered by how likely the results are to be real publications. Free, unlimited, no account.

2. Check what you found against our list

Paste the results back. We strip the noise, collapse duplicates to one row per site, and tell you which of them are already on our marketplace with a price — and which we have already audited.

3 of 3 free checks left.

Any format. Full URLs, bare domains, or a whole block copied out of Google — 54 known non-opportunities are removed automatically, including reddit.com, quora.com, medium.com.

The operator everyone uses is the one to use last

Every guide to this subject opens with “write for us”, and every prospecting tool leads with it. Which is the problem. It is the single most-run search in link building, so the sites it returns are the sites that have received the most outreach — often thousands of emails, frequently from people offering money.

A site that ranks for several of those explicit operators at once is telling you something. It is not that they are keen on contributors; it is that soliciting contributions is a large part of what the site does. That correlates closely with paid-link density, which is the first thing our own vetting checks and the most common reason a site never reaches our marketplace.

So the searches here are ordered the other way round. Bylines first, because a site that publishes outside writers without advertising for them has an editor making choices. Editorial guidelines next, because writing guidelines is what publications do. The explicit operators are still there — they find real sites too — but they come with a note telling you to vet the results rather than pitch them blind.

What happens after you have a list

A list of two hundred domains is not progress. Most prospecting stops here, and the usual next step is to load them into a tool that reports domain rating, then email whichever ones clear an arbitrary threshold. That is how people end up buying placements on sites that look fine on paper and pass nothing.

The second step of this tool answers the only question that actually saves you time: have we already looked at this? For 410 domains the answer is yes, and you get the price we sell it at. For anything we have audited, you get the verdict. For everything else you get an honest nothing, because inventing a signal we do not have would make the whole tool worthless.

Questions about finding guest post sites

Search operators are still the most effective method, and they cost nothing. Combine your topic with the phrases publishers use on their contributor pages — "write for us", "become a contributor", "guest post by" — and Google returns sites that accept outside writing. This tool builds ten such searches for any keyword, ordered by how likely the results are to be real publications.
Not the popular one. "Write for us" is the most-used operator in link building, which is exactly why its results are the most heavily solicited sites on the internet — every prospector has already emailed them. Searching for existing bylines instead ("guest post by", "contributing writer") finds sites that publish outside contributors without advertising for them. Far fewer results, considerably better ones.
The searches are free and unlimited, with no account. The second step — checking what you found against our vetted publisher list — is 3 free runs, then a free account. That step queries our own inventory, which is the part no other tool can do.
One of three things per domain, and only these three. That it is on our marketplace, in which case you get its domain rating, traffic and current price. That we have run it through our publisher trust audit before, with the verdict and date. Or that we have never assessed it — which is stated plainly as an absence of information, not dressed up as a warning.
Reddit, Quora, Medium, Substack, LinkedIn, Wikipedia and around fifty other domains are never guest post opportunities but dominate these result sets. They are stripped, along with duplicates — which are collapsed to one row per site, so blog.example.com and example.com/write-for-us count once rather than twice.
For now, yes, and it is a deliberate trade. Fetching results automatically means paying a search API for every query, which would mean either charging for the tool or capping it tightly. Pasting takes a few seconds and keeps the whole thing free.

Or skip the searching

410 publishers already assessed, each listed with its price, its metrics and the checks it passed. Nothing behind a form.

Browse the marketplace